In brief

  • In one and the same sitting, that of 23 September 2026, the Chamber of Deputies adopted seven resolutions, numbered 57 to 63. Each one carries the Chamber’s position on a single document of the European Commission: the health crisis plan, quality jobs, the bioeconomy, the data union and artificial intelligence, critical raw materials, economic security and heart health. All seven appeared in the Official Gazette of Romania (Monitorul Oficial) on 25 September 2026.
  • Not one of them obliges anybody to do anything. Article 17 of Law no. 373/2013 on cooperation between Parliament and the Government in European affairs provides that resolutions on the Union’s strategy, programming or consultation documents are advisory for the Government. All seven communications are documents of that kind, so the 146 points they contain between them are requests and assessments, not rules.
  • The direct addressee is the Government, which builds from them the position it defends in Brussels. Indirectly, those affected are the people in the sectors concerned: medical staff and cardiac patients, employees and employers, farmers and the industry working with biomass, companies processing data, mining companies and those that depend on rare earths. For them, nothing changes at this moment.
Act: Chamber of Deputies Resolution no. 57/2026 on the adoption of the opinion on the Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions — Introducing the Union’s health crisis prevention, preparedness and response plan — COM (2025) 745; Chamber of Deputies Resolution no. 58/2026 on the adoption of the opinion on the Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions — Quality Jobs Roadmap — COM (2025) 944; Chamber of Deputies Resolution no. 59/2026 on the adoption of the opinion on the Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions — A strategic framework for a competitive and sustainable EU bioeconomy — COM (2025) 960; Chamber of Deputies Resolution no. 60/2026 on the adoption of the opinion on the Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council — Strategy on a European Data Union — Unlocking the potential of data for AI — COM (2025) 835; Chamber of Deputies Resolution no. 61/2026 on the adoption of the opinion on the Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions — RESourceEU Action Plan — Accelerating our critical raw materials strategy to adapt to a new reality — COM (2025) 945; Chamber of Deputies Resolution no. 62/2026 on the adoption of the opinion on the Joint Communication to the European Parliament and the Council — Strengthening the EU’s economic security — JOIN (2025) 977; Chamber of Deputies Resolution no. 63/2026 on the adoption of the opinion on the Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on an EU plan for cardiovascular health: the Heart Health Plan — COM (2025) 1024
Published: Official Gazette of Romania, Part I, no. 817 of 25 September 2026, pages 2-9
In force from: from publication, 25 September 2026, because Article 12(3) of Law no. 24/2000 on legislative drafting rules provides that normative acts, with the exception of laws and ordinances, take effect on the date of publication in the Official Gazette of Romania unless they themselves lay down a later date, and none of the seven resolutions does

The seven resolutions published on 25 September 2026 take up eight pages of issue 817 of the Official Gazette of Romania and were all voted in the sitting of the Chamber of Deputies of 23 September. They are opinions on documents of the European Commission, and one of them, the one on the heart health plan, asks for prevention to receive more money than it does now. In Romania, the decisions that actually change something in cardiology are taken by far smaller acts, such as the order by which leadless pacemakers entered the list of supplies reimbursed by the health insurance house. The difference between the two kinds of act is worth explaining once, because resolutions of this sort appear in the Official Gazette of Romania a few times a year and are easy to mistake for laws.

The mechanism is called parliamentary scrutiny and is governed by Law no. 373/2013. The European Commission sends national parliaments its proposals and its policy documents. The Chamber of Deputies, through the Committee on European Affairs, analyses them and prepares a text called an opinion. If the plenary adopts it, the text becomes a resolution of the Chamber and is published in the Official Gazette of Romania. Article 11 of the law requires the resolution to reach the Government at least 3 working days before the date on which the negotiating mandate in the Council is finalised, and Article 3(2) provides that the Government takes it over when establishing the national position. If it defends something else, Article 3(5) obliges it to give written reasons.

This is where the limit comes in. The same law provides, in Article 17, that resolutions on the Union’s strategy, programming or consultation documents are advisory for the Government. The documents the Chamber analysed are, all seven of them, communications, which is precisely that category. None of them is a proposal for a regulation or a directive, so there is no negotiating mandate in the Council for the resolutions to influence and there is no 3-working-day period of the kind Article 11 speaks of. The Chamber gave its view on the direction the Commission is taking, and the Government may take account of it or not, without owing anyone written reasons.

What the Chamber asked for, on each of the seven subjects. On the health crisis prevention and response plan, communication COM (2025) 745, Resolution no. 57/2026 supports the One Health approach, calls for simulation exercises including on the supply chains for medical countermeasures, and draws attention to factors that weaken crisis response: social inequalities, the shortage of qualified staff, the uneven distribution of specialists, the erosion of trust in institutions and disinformation. Mental health gets a point of its own, the seventeenth, because the European plan treats it thinly.

On the quality jobs roadmap, COM (2025) 944, Resolution no. 58/2026 insists on the transposition of Directive (EU) 2023/970 on pay transparency, calls for European standards on the right to disconnect and raises the question of algorithmic management, that is, the situation in which a program decides who works and for how long. The recommendations also include measures to reduce the departure of Romanians to work abroad.

On the strategic framework for the bioeconomy, COM (2025) 960, Resolution no. 59/2026 calls for sustainability and traceability criteria for biomass, from origin to life-cycle emissions, and for green public procurement that would create demand for biomaterials. Point 3 corrects a narrow understanding of the field: the bioeconomy also covers distribution, trade, research, consultancy, education and the regulation of the market in biological products, beyond the processing of biomass.

On the Strategy on a European Data Union, COM (2025) 835, Resolution no. 60/2026 calls for clean and standardised public datasets, especially on traffic, public health and climate, for clarification of the legal regime of anonymised and pseudonymised data, and for a framework for data intermediaries, so that opaque brokerage can be penalised. It also calls for protection of industrial and technical data, which are not personal but are sensitive.

The opinion contained in Resolution no. 61/2026, on the RESourceEU action plan for critical raw materials, COM (2025) 945, goes down to the level of individual technologies: the conversion of lithium minerals into carbonate and hydroxide for batteries, direct lithium extraction from geothermal resources and from brines, the separation and refining of rare earths, ferrite-based magnets as an alternative to those made from rare earths, cobalt-based cathode precursors. Point 23 also states a sovereignty reservation: each State decides on its own resources.

On the joint communication on economic security, JOIN (2025) 977, Resolution no. 62/2026 supports the screening of foreign direct investment, export controls on sensitive technologies and the protection of critical infrastructure. The last of the seven, Resolution no. 63/2026, given on the heart health plan, COM (2025) 1024, calls for defibrillators in public places, a European early-detection protocol, a revision of tobacco rules so that they also catch electronic cigarettes, heated tobacco and nicotine pouches, and tax measures against the consumption of alcohol by minors. Point 18 gives the only figure in the whole batch: only 3% of healthcare spending goes to prevention, which the Chamber considers insufficient.

What it changes in practice

The direct legal effect is confined to the relationship between the Chamber of Deputies and the Government, and there it is one of information, not of command. The Government receives seven written positions that it may use when preparing its interventions in the Council and in the Union’s working groups. It is not obliged to follow them, nor to explain why it does not, because Article 3(5) of Law no. 373/2013 ties the duty to give reasons to resolutions that are not advisory.

The practical effect is a different one and it is about transparency. Until publication, these positions existed as opinions of the Committee on European Affairs, that is, internal documents of the Chamber, numbered 7c-21/356, 7c-21/473, 7c-21/474 and 7c-21/495 to 7c-21/498. Publication takes them out of the internal circuit, dates them and makes them verifiable. An employers’ association negotiating with the ministry of labour can point to point 13 of Resolution no. 58/2026 and say that the right to disconnect already has the support of the Chamber. A patients’ association can do the same with point 18 of Resolution no. 63/2026.

The third effect is one of calendar. The communications carry 2025 numbers, the committee opinions were prepared between April and June 2026, and the resolutions reach the Official Gazette of Romania at the end of September 2026. Anyone following a European file now knows when the Parliament of Romania took its position and can compare the date with the moment at which the Commission moved from a communication to a legislative proposal.

What has changed compared with the previous situation

Before 25 September 2026, on the seven subjects there was only the position of a parliamentary committee. Now there is the position of the Chamber, adopted in plenary by the majority provided for in Article 76(2) of the Constitution, the simple one, and published in full. The difference is one of authority and of accessibility, because the text of the resolution reproduces the committee’s opinion.

The volume has changed as well. Seven resolutions in a single sitting, with 146 points between them, is a clearing of the backlog, not an ordinary pace. Three of them, those numbered 61, 62 and 63, come from opinions adopted by the committee on the same day, 16 June 2026, and another two, 58 and 59, from 9 June. The oldest text, the one on the health crisis plan, had been prepared on 28 April 2026, 148 days before the vote in plenary.

For the citizen, on the other hand, nothing has changed. No resolution creates a right, imposes an obligation or amends any Romanian law. They are political positions published in the form that the law requires for acts of Parliament, and that gives them a normative air that the content does not have.

Advantages and disadvantages

What it improves

  • The positions become public and dated. Anyone can read what the Chamber asked for, on which document and on which day, without requesting access to a committee’s archive.
  • The texts get down to specifics on a few technical subjects. Resolution no. 61/2026 mentions technologies and materials, not just principles, which means that somebody actually read the Commission’s communication.
  • Three of the seven link the European discussion to the situation in Romania: 58 speaks about the development gap and about the departure of the workforce, 61 about the strategic projects on Romanian territory, and 62 about the national mechanism for screening foreign investment.
  • Point 18 of Resolution no. 63/2026 puts a figure on the table, the 3% of health spending that goes to prevention, and declares it insufficient. It is the only place in the batch where a position rests on a measurement.
  • Adopting them as a block, in the same sitting, shortens the delay accumulated on the older files and brings the Chamber’s European affairs calendar up to date.

What remains a problem

  • No resolution says who carries the positions forward, or by when. There is no deadline, no responsible institution and no duty to report back to the Chamber on what the Government did with them.
  • Four of the seven never name Romania: 57, 59, 60 and 63. They are comments on European policy from which one cannot learn what Romania is asking for itself.
  • The language stays at the level of positioning verbs. The Chamber supports, appreciates, welcomes, recommends, draws attention. Out of 146 points, not one asks the Government to do a specific thing by a specific date.
  • The delay is long for documents that lose their currency. Between the committee opinion and the plenary vote, 99, 106 and 148 days passed, and the communications commented on carry 2025 numbers.
  • Two pairs overlap without referring to each other. Resolution no. 57/2026 and Resolution no. 63/2026 both call for prevention and interoperable data in health, while Resolution no. 60/2026 calls for data quality standards that would also cover the request in point 16 of Resolution no. 63/2026.

Practical advice

  1. Read them as position documents, not as rules. If you are wondering what you have to do differently from 25 September 2026, the answer is: nothing.
  2. If you work in a sector touched by one of the seven subjects, take the number of the communication, for example COM (2025) 945, and search for it in the public register of European Commission documents. There you will find the text commented on, which usually has more substance than the opinion.
  3. Use the points as an argument in dialogue with the relevant ministry. A position adopted by the plenary of the Chamber and published in the Official Gazette of Romania carries more weight than a letter from an association, even if it obliges nobody.
  4. Watch for the moment at which the Commission turns a communication into a legislative proposal. From then on the Chamber’s resolution stops being advisory, because Article 3(2) of Law no. 373/2013 applies to acts under negotiation.
  5. Do not confuse the numbering. Resolutions of the Chamber of Deputies have their own annual series, so Resolution no. 57/2026 of the Chamber has nothing to do with a Government decision or a law bearing the same number.

Frequently asked questions

Do these opinions oblige the Government to defend anything in particular in Brussels?
No. Law no. 373/2013 provides, in Article 17, that resolutions on the Union’s strategy, programming or consultation documents are advisory for the Government. All seven documents commented on are communications, so they fall into that category.
What is a communication of the European Commission?
A document in which the Commission announces its intentions in a field, without creating rights or obligations. Proposals for regulations or directives may come out of it later, and those are binding once adopted.
Why do seven resolutions appear at once?
They were adopted in the same sitting of the Chamber of Deputies, that of 23 September 2026, and published together two days later. The opinions they are based on had been prepared by the Committee on European Affairs on 28 April, 9 June and 16 June 2026.
Does this apply to the Senate as well?
No. Each Chamber adopts its own resolutions on European affairs. The seven acts published on 25 September 2026 belong exclusively to the Chamber of Deputies.
From when do they take effect?
From publication, 25 September 2026. Article 12(3) of Law no. 24/2000 provides that normative acts, with the exception of laws and ordinances, enter into force on the date of publication in the Official Gazette of Romania unless they themselves lay down a later date. The 3-day period in paragraph (1) concerns laws and ordinances.
Where can I see what the Government did with them?
Nowhere, for the time being. None of the seven resolutions asks the Government to report to the Chamber on the position it defended, and none sets a deadline for doing so.

Editorial analysis

The seven texts are correctly drafted, they do not contradict one another and they contain no wrong references. The European regulations cited exist and say what is attributed to them: Regulation (EU) 2022/2371 on serious cross-border threats to health, Regulation (EU) 2022/2372 on the supply of medical countermeasures in crisis situations and Directive (EU) 2023/970 on pay transparency. The problem lies in the ratio between effort and effect, not in the way they are written.

The opinion numbers of the Committee on European Affairs say something that cannot be seen by reading the resolutions one by one. The oldest, used by Resolution no. 57/2026, bears the number 7c-21/356 and was adopted on 28 April 2026. The most recent, 7c-21/495 to 7c-21/498, are from 16 June 2026. Between them lie 142 positions in the register and 49 days, so in that interval the committee recorded, on average, almost three documents per working day. That volume explains why the plenary voted seven resolutions at once: this is not a campaign on European affairs, it is a queue being cleared.

The second observation comes out of comparing the seven. Four of them, Resolutions 57, 59, 60 and 63, do not name Romania in any of their points. Resolution no. 62/2026, on the other hand, names it four times, in points 16 to 19, and there the Chamber asks for nothing but notes and welcomes what Romania already does: it takes part in the European instruments, it has set up the national mechanism for screening foreign direct investment, it contributes to the European framework. A step outside the advisory pattern, that is, a specific request addressed to the Romanian Government, does not appear even in the text where Romania is mentioned most often.

The third observation is about overlap. Resolution no. 63/2026 calls, in point 16, for interoperable data on cardiovascular diseases in the European Health Data Space. In points 5 and 6, Resolution no. 60/2026 calls for standardised public datasets from health and for common European data quality standards. These are the same request, formulated by two different committees a month apart and voted in the same sitting, without either resolution mentioning the other. In a single position document, the two would have been consolidated and would have carried more weight.

What should be changed

  • A deadline for the Government to answer. The Chamber could ask, in the text of the resolution itself, for written information on the position defended in the Council, within 60 days of publication. That would turn a position document into an instrument of parliamentary scrutiny, without changing its advisory nature.
  • One position per file, not per document. The two health resolutions and the one on data ask for things that overlap. A single text on each file, updated whenever the Commission publishes a new document, would remove the repetition and show clearly where the Chamber’s position has changed.
  • An internal deadline between the committee opinion and the plenary vote. A delay of 148 days takes the position out of the European calendar. A 45-day deadline, written into the Rules of Procedure of the Chamber of Deputies, would keep the opinion inside the window in which it can still be of use to someone.
  • At least one request addressed to the Romanian administration in every resolution. If Resolution no. 63/2026 considers the 3% spent on prevention insufficient, the text could name the target that Romania is pursuing, instead of merely noting the European figure.
  • Publication of the document commented on alongside the resolution. A reader who does not have the COM number at hand cannot check whether the Chamber’s position matches the Commission’s text. A reference to the address of the document, in the preamble, would settle that in one line.

Original text of the legal act

The text below is reproduced in Romanian, the official form of publication.

The full text, as published in the Official Gazette of Romania

Official Gazette of Romania no. 817 of 25 September 2026, pages 2-9 16 pages PDF, 117 KB the act starts on page 2

Open the official PDFDownload the PDF

The viewer is not shown on small screens. Use the buttons above to open or download the file.

This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For specific situations, consult a licensed attorney or tax advisor.