In brief

  • Nine chemicals that until now were sold freely move, from 18 September 2026, into the most tightly controlled category in the European Union. Anyone who produces them, sells them, buys them or merely keeps them in a warehouse needs a licence, and the licence is applied for from the police.
  • Without a licence, trading in them is no longer a regulatory lapse, it is a criminal offence. Romanian law provides for 6 months to 5 years in prison, or a fine, for placing on the market, importing, exporting or simply holding these substances without a licence, and the investigation is handled by DIICOT.
  • Three of the nine substances are used in making medicines sold in the Union, among them bupropion, used to treat depression and to help people stop smoking, and tolperisone, a muscle relaxant. All nine are used as reference standards in analytical laboratories, so the rule reaches laboratories too, not only chemical plants.
Act: Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2026/314 of 9 February 2026 amending Regulation (EC) No 273/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council and Council Regulation (EC) No 111/2005 as regards the inclusion of certain precursors of synthetic cathinone and amphetamine in the list of scheduled substances
Published: Official Journal of the European Union, L series, 2026/314 of 28 April 2026
In force from: 18 May 2026, the twentieth day following publication. The obligations, however, apply only from 18 September 2026, under the second paragraph of Article 3

Nine chemicals that were not controlled anywhere in the European Union move, from 18 September 2026, into the most closely watched category of the drug precursors regime. Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2026/314, adopted in Brussels on 9 February 2026 and published on 28 April 2026 in the Official Journal of the European Union, adds them to the lists of the two regulations that supervise trade in precursors, one for trade inside the Union and the other for trade with countries outside it. For the rules to bind in Romania, no law voted in Bucharest is needed: a European regulation applies directly, as happened with the regulation that placed all 41 counties and Bucharest in the severest African swine fever zone. For a chemical producer, a distributor or a laboratory in the country, this means a licence, a file, records and reports, from a fixed date.

The substances are propiophenones and their brominated derivatives, plus one nitro compound. The act lists them in recital (2) and explains what they are for in recital (3): 3’-chloropropiophenone and 2-bromo-3’-chloropropiophenone lead to 3-CMC, also called clophedrone; 3’-methylpropiophenone and 2-bromo-3’-methylpropiophenone lead to 3-MMC; 4’-methylpropiophenone and 2-bromo-4’-methylpropiophenone lead to mephedrone, that is 4-MMC; 4’-chloropropiophenone and 2-bromo-4’-chloropropiophenone lead to 4-CMC, or clephedrone; and phenyl-2-nitropropene leads to amphetamine. The first four are synthetic cathinones, the party drugs that have replaced the classic stimulants over the past decade.

All five are already controlled drugs in Romania. Mephedrone, 4-CMC, 3-MMC and 3-CMC appear in Table no. I of Law no. 143/2000, the list of high-risk drugs: 4-CMC entered it in April 2022, through Law no. 80/2022, and 3-MMC and 3-CMC in April 2023, through Law no. 77/2023. Amphetamine has been in Table no. II of the same law from the start. What is new on 18 September 2026 happens at the level of the raw material. Until now, the very substance a controlled drug is made from could be bought with no formality whatsoever.

The reason is written into recitals (2) and (5). National authorities reported an increase in seizures of the nine substances, and the Commission asked the European Union Drugs Agency for an assessment. The agency’s conclusion, quoted in the act, is what explains why the Commission went straight to the severest category: the substances can be turned into drugs „through straightforward and scalable methods, needing only basic equipment and minimal technical proficiency”. Recital (6) draws the conclusion and states it plainly: they go into Category 1 because „they pose the greatest risk when diverted towards illicit production”.

The part that hits the lawful economy, though, is in recital (5) and recital (10). Three of the nine substances have real medical uses: 3’-chloropropiophenone is used in making bupropion, a medicine for depression and for smoking cessation, 2-bromo-3’-chloropropiophenone is an intermediate of the same bupropion, and 4’-methylpropiophenone is used in making tolperisone, a muscle relaxant authorised for spasms and spasticity. Phenyl-2-nitropropene can be used in amphetamine-based medicines. Beyond that, the European agency confirms that all nine are used as reference standards in analytical laboratories. So the rule does not catch traffickers alone: it also catches a quality-control laboratory keeping a reference vial on a shelf.

In Romania, the application does not go to the health ministry or to the anti-drug agency, as many would expect. The competent authority for precursors is, under Article 2(1) of Law no. 142/2018, the General Inspectorate of the Romanian Police, and contact is made through the specialised structure inside it, which acts as a single point of contact. The name changed fairly recently: until 13 March 2025 the law named the National Anti-Drug Agency, and the replacement was made by Government Emergency Ordinance no. 147 of 12 December 2024. The licence is granted for 3 years, and the holder has to apply for a new one at least 30 days before it expires.

The penalties come in two kinds, and both are in Law no. 142/2018. Record-keeping and reporting lapses draw a fine of 4,000 to 10,000 lei, under Article 18. But placing on the market, importing, exporting, intermediary activities and even the mere holding of a scheduled substance without a licence are criminal offences, punishable by 6 months to 5 years in prison or by a fine, under Article 20(1). Anyone supplying such substances to a person without a licence faces 3 months to 3 years. The criminal investigation in these cases falls to DIICOT, the directorate whose jurisdiction over connected offences was confirmed by the Constitutional Court in September 2026.

What it changes in practice

For trade inside the Union, and therefore for sales between two Romanian companies as well, Category 1 means six obligations that apply cumulatively. First: a licence from the General Inspectorate of the Romanian Police to hold or place the substance on the market, under Article 3(2) of Regulation (EC) No 273/2004. Second: the designation of an officer responsible for the trade in scheduled substances, whose name and contact details are notified to the authority, plus a criminal record certificate for that person. Third: supply only to other licence holders who have signed a customer declaration, one for each substance separately. Fourth: labelling the substance with the name from the annex, before supply. Fifth: documenting every transaction and keeping the documents for at least three years from the end of the calendar year in which it took place. Sixth: immediate notification of the authority of any unusual order or transaction.

For trade with countries outside the Union, Regulation (EC) No 111/2005 adds a layer on top of the licence. Importing a Category 1 substance requires an import authorisation, under Article 20, exporting requires an export authorisation, under Article 12(1), and every export must be preceded by a notification sent to the authorities of the country of destination, under Article 11(1). The authorisations are granted for one operation rather than once and for all, so every consignment is authorised separately.

Pharmacies, veterinary practices, certain categories of public authority and the armed forces do not take the usual route. They can obtain a special licence, valid only for their official activity, granted for an unlimited period, with certification every 3 years that the conditions still hold. The Government decision implementing the Romanian law provides that the special licence is granted within 30 days of the registration of the application, and that pharmacies and veterinary practices also attach their operating authorisation to the application. For a pharmacy keeping one of these substances as a reagent or as an analytical reference, the road is therefore shorter, but not non-existent.

The powers of control grow along with the obligations. Article 10 of Regulation (EC) No 273/2004 requires Member States to give the authorities the right to request information about any order, to enter the business premises of operators and users to gather evidence, and to detain and seize non-compliant consignments. Until 18 September 2026 the only thing available for the nine substances was the optional variant in paragraph (2), the monitoring of suspicious transactions involving non-scheduled substances. From 18 September the hard variant becomes mandatory.

There is one more effect that has nothing to do with licences. Recital (7) links the scheduling to criminal law: once on the list, the nine substances become „precursors” within the meaning of Article 1, point 2, of Framework Decision 2004/757/JHA, which defines the minimum elements of trafficking offences. Article 2(1)(d) of the same Framework Decision requires Member States to punish the production, transport or distribution of precursors where the person doing it knows what they are to be used for. The substance does not have to have been turned into a drug: it is enough that it was moved, knowingly.

What has changed compared with the previous situation

Until 18 September 2026, the nine substances were what the act itself calls them in recital (2): non-scheduled substances. They could be manufactured, sold, bought, imported and exported without a licence, without a customer declaration, without a label bearing the official name, without a transaction register and without a transport authorisation. The only obligation that could touch an operator was to answer, if asked, a request for information about a suspicious transaction, and even that was not mandatory for the Member State. Moving into Category 1 skips Categories 2 and 3, which have intermediate regimes, and goes straight to the maximum.

The most practical difference turns on a phrase in Article 3(2) of Regulation (EC) No 273/2004: the licence is needed not only to place on the market, but also to „hold”. A laboratory that already has a reference standard vial of one of the nine on the shelf has nothing to sell, but it needs a licence to keep it. This is where it becomes clear why the Commission deferred the application: recital (11) says the deferral is intended to give economic operators time to obtain the import or export authorisations and the appropriate licences.

The way the substances are identified at customs has changed as well. The nine new entries sit under three Combined Nomenclature codes, and six of them share a single code, 2914 79 00. That code also covers goods with no connection whatsoever to precursors, so it does not by itself tell you whether a consignment falls under the licensing regime. What decides is the CAS number, set out in the annex for each substance. A customs declarant therefore cannot stop at the tariff-code filter.

Finally, the manufacturing chain of two medicines has changed. Bupropion and tolperisone were made from unrestricted raw materials; from 18 September 2026, two of bupropion’s intermediates and one of tolperisone’s move only between licence holders. Pharmaceutical use gets no exemption: the legitimate use is recognised in recital (10) as a reason for deferring the application, not as a reason for exemption.

Advantages and disadvantages

What it improves

  • It closes a gap that was visible in the figures. Seizures of the nine substances were rising while they were sold freely, so controlling the final drug meant nothing for the raw material it was made from.
  • The four-month deferral has a practical effect. Entry into force was on 18 May 2026, but the obligations start on 18 September 2026, precisely so that operators have time to obtain the licences and authorisations.
  • It acknowledges lawful trade openly. Recitals (5) and (10) name the medicines and the laboratory uses, instead of treating the substances as being of criminal interest only.
  • One single amendment for both regulations. Recital (9) explains why: the empowerments are substantively linked, so internal trade and trade with third countries fall into line on the same day, with no gap.
  • The identification of the substances is complete. Every entry has the common name, the Combined Nomenclature designation, the tariff code and the CAS number, so no room is left for confusion about the molecule.
  • The criminal effect is stated openly. Recital (7) says directly that the substances become „precursors” within the meaning of the 2004 Framework Decision, so nobody can claim to have been taken by surprise by the classification.

What remains a problem

  • The two dates in Article 3 are hard to read together. An act that enters into force on 18 May and applies from 18 September has four months in which it exists but does not bind, and recital (7) refers precisely to the date of entry into force for the criminal effect.
  • The four months are not a transitional period for stocks. On substances already in a warehouse on 18 September 2026 the text is silent, so they come under the licensing regime that same day, wherever they happen to be.
  • Nothing guarantees that the licence arrives in time. The authority has 60 working days to decide on a complete application, and anyone who filed later than the end of June 2026 no longer had that guarantee.
  • There is no express basis for licences issued in advance. Recital (11) assumes that operators obtain the licences during the deferral period, but a licence is granted for Category 1 substances, a quality these acquire only on 18 September 2026.
  • Small laboratories pay the most. A reference standard is bought in quantities of grams, but the licence file requires a technological process, a designated officer and a criminal record certificate, exactly as for a factory.
  • The tariff codes are not written the same way in the two annexes. The same digits appear as 2914 79 00 in Annex II and as 29 147 900 in Annex I, and in the consolidated list the new entries now sit next to entries written in the other format.

Practical advice

  1. Check your stock by CAS number, not by trade name. The nine numbers are 34841-35-5, 34911-51-8, 51772-30-6, 1451-83-8, 5337-93-9, 1451-82-7, 6285-05-8, 877-37-2 and 705-60-2. A catalogue name can be written in dozens of ways, a CAS number cannot.
  2. If you find any of them, even a single reference standard vial, treat the situation as being under licence from 18 September 2026. Article 3(2) of Regulation (EC) No 273/2004 requires a licence for mere holding, not only for sale.
  3. File the application with the single point of contact at the General Inspectorate of the Romanian Police, not with the National Anti-Drug Agency. Law no. 142/2018 was amended on 13 March 2025, and many older guides and forms still point to the old authority.
  4. Get the file ready before you submit it, because the 60-working-day period runs from a complete application. A request for further documents suspends the processing, and failing to send them within 15 days leads to refusal.
  5. If you are a pharmacy or a veterinary practice, apply for a special licence, not an ordinary one. It is granted within 30 days of the registration of the application, for an unlimited period, with certification of the conditions every 3 years, and the operating authorisation is attached.
  6. Put the expiry date of the licence in your calendar, not just the date you obtained it. The application for a new one is filed at least 30 days in advance, and an expired licence brings you under Article 20 of Law no. 142/2018, which provides for 6 months to 5 years in prison.
  7. If you sell to someone else, check their licence before supply and keep the proof. Supplying a person without a licence is punished separately, by 3 months to 3 years in prison or by a fine.
  8. If you export or import, count on the per-operation authorisation as well, on top of the licence. Importing from Category 1 requires an import authorisation, exporting requires an export authorisation and a prior notification sent to the country of destination.

Frequently asked questions

From when does it apply, from 18 May or from 18 September 2026?
The obligations apply from 18 September 2026. The regulation entered into force earlier, on 18 May 2026, that is on the twentieth day following publication on 28 April 2026, but the second paragraph of Article 3 defers the application by four months.
Does Romania have to adopt a law for the rules to bind?
No. The regulation is binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States, under the final formula of Article 3. The national framework already exists: Law no. 142/2018 on drug precursors sets the competent authority and the penalties.
Where do I file the licence application in Romania?
With the specialised structure at the General Inspectorate of the Romanian Police, which acts as the single point of contact for drug precursors, under Article 2 of Law no. 142/2018. Until 13 March 2025 the competence lay with the National Anti-Drug Agency.
How long does it take to obtain the licence?
The authority decides within 60 working days of receiving a complete application, or within 30 working days on renewal. The special licence for pharmacies, veterinary practices, public authorities and the armed forces is granted within 30 days of the registration of the application.
I have a reference standard of one of these substances on the shelf. Does this concern me?
Yes. The licence is needed for holding as well, not only for marketing, and the act acknowledges in recital (5) that all nine substances have legitimate uses as reference standards in laboratories. There is no exemption for small quantities.
What happens to stocks held on 18 September 2026?
The act lays down no separate rule for them. From that date, the stock becomes a stock of a Category 1 scheduled substance, with everything that follows: a licence to hold, records, labelling and notification of operations.
Can anyone go to prison for not having a licence?
Yes. Article 20(1) of Law no. 142/2018 punishes with 6 months to 5 years in prison or with a fine the placing on the market, import, export, intermediary activities and holding of scheduled substances without a licence. The criminal investigation falls to DIICOT.
Does anything change for patients taking bupropion or tolperisone?
Not directly. What changes is the regime of three raw materials in their manufacturing chain, not the regime of the medicines. The marketing authorisations remain untouched and no product is withdrawn.
Why go straight to Category 1 rather than an intermediate category?
Recital (6) explains: the substances pose the greatest risk when diverted towards illicit production, and to avoid their diversion from licit channels their trade and use must be subject to the strictest control and monitoring measures.
Where do I find the official text in Romanian?
In the Official Journal of the European Union, L series, number 2026/314 of 28 April 2026, over five pages. The Romanian version published there is itself official, not a working translation.

Errors and inconsistencies in the published text

  • Recital (7) against the second paragraph of Article 3. The recital says that, „from the date of entry into force of this Regulation”, the nine substances are to be considered „precursors” within the meaning of Article 1, point 2, of Framework Decision 2004/757/JHA. Entry into force was on 18 May 2026, but the annexes that actually put them on the list apply only from 18 September 2026, and the definition in the Framework Decision is tied precisely to inclusion in the list. The result is 123 days in which the act points to a criminal classification that its own Article 3 does not yet produce. The English and the Romanian versions are worded the same way here, so this is a drafting defect of the act rather than a translation slip.
  • Annex II, introductory sentence, in the Romanian version only. The English text reads „in the Annex to Regulation (EC) No 111/2005”, which is correct, so a reader working from the English version will find nothing wrong at this point. The Romanian version, which is equally official and is the one that binds readers in Romania, reads „În anexa I la Regulamentul (CE) nr. 111/2005”, „in Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 111/2005”, although that regulation has a single annex with no number, as Article 30a of it and Article 2 and recital (1) of the present act all call it. The Romanian text therefore sends the reader to an annex that does not exist.

Editorial analysis

The act is well built where it matters: nine substances each identified by four elements, a reason written in figures rather than in principles, and a deferral of application justified expressly by lawful trade. The problem is not what it says but how much of the transition period it promises actually reaches the addressee. The Commission deferred the application by four months from entry into force, that is 123 calendar days between 18 May and 18 September 2026, which sounds generous. Counted in working days, the interval comes to 88. And Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1013, to which the Romanian implementing regulation itself refers, gives the authority 60 working days to decide on a complete licence application.

The subtraction gives the result that is invisible on the face of the act. Of the 88 working days, 60 belong to the administration, which leaves the operator 28 to put the file together and submit it. More precisely: the last working day on which a complete application could still be filed with a guarantee of a decision by 18 September 2026 was Friday, 26 June 2026. Anyone who filed on Monday, 29 June, was three days outside the period and no longer had any legal guarantee of holding a licence on the day the obligation starts. For the operator, the four-month deferral is worth about a month and a week. And that is the optimistic version, with no request for further documents, even though the implementing regulation provides that such a request suspends the processing and that the operator has 15 days to reply, on pain of refusal.

The second figure says something about the relationship between the deadlines the administration imposes and those it sets for itself. Adoption was on 9 February 2026 and publication on 28 April 2026, so 78 days later. A good part of those is legitimately explained: delegated acts enter into force only if the European Parliament and the Council raise no objection within two months of notification, a period laid down in Article 15a(5) of Regulation (EC) No 273/2004 and in Article 30b(5) of Regulation (EC) No 111/2005, with the possibility of a two-month extension. The rest is administrative road. The consequence, though, is structural rather than a matter of calendar: by fixing the date of application at 18 September 2026 as early as 9 February, when nobody knew when the act would be published, the Commission tied the length of the transition to its own speed of publication. Had publication come a month later, operators would have had a month less, without the text changing by a single letter.

The third point concerns the way Romania receives the act, and it can be checked in a few minutes. Since 13 March 2025, Law no. 142/2018 names the General Inspectorate of the Romanian Police as the competent authority, through the replacement made by Government Emergency Ordinance no. 147/2024. The 2019 Government decision implementing the law has not been updated, however: its roughly fifty references to the authority still say National Anti-Drug Agency, and the General Inspectorate of the Romanian Police appears nowhere. The act that says who decides says one thing, and the act that says how the application is filed says another. For an operator complying on time, in the very month in which nine new substances come under licence, that is the first stone in the road, and it does not come from Brussels.

What should be changed

  • Recital (7) should refer to the date of application, not to entry into force. The 123-day interval in which the text suggests a criminal classification the annexes do not yet produce would disappear, and operators would have a single date to remember.
  • Annex II of the Romanian version should be corrected in the Official Journal of the European Union. The correct formula is „anexa la Regulamentul (CE) nr. 111/2005”, as in Article 2 of the same act and as in the English version, which would remove the reference to a non-existent annex.
  • The deferral should be expressed as an interval from entry into force, not as a fixed date. A formula of the type „shall apply four months after entry into force” would give operators the same number of days however late publication comes, instead of shortening the transition with every week of administrative road.
  • The act should provide expressly that licences may be applied for and granted before the date of application. Recital (11) already assumes this, but a licence is granted for Category 1 substances, a quality these acquire only on 18 September 2026, so the basis ought to be written into the text.
  • Existing stocks should get a rule of their own. A transitional provision of the type „substances held on the date of application may be kept until an application for a licence filed before that date has been decided” would resolve the position of someone who filed in time and is waiting for an answer.
  • The Combined Nomenclature codes should be written in the same format in both annexes. The same eight digits appear grouped as 2914 79 00 in Annex II and as 29 147 900 in Annex I, and in the consolidated list the new entries now sit next to entries written differently, in the same column.
  • The regulation implementing Law no. 142/2018 should be updated. As long as it sends the operator to the National Anti-Drug Agency while the law gives the competence to the General Inspectorate of the Romanian Police, the single point of contact exists only on the paper that does not describe the procedure.

Original text of the legal act

The text below is reproduced in Romanian, the official form of publication.

The full text, as published in the Official Gazette of Romania

Official Journal of the European Union, L series, 2026/314 of 28 April 2026 5 pages PDF, 488 KB

Open the official PDFDownload the PDF

The viewer is not shown on small screens. Use the buttons above to open or download the file.

This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For specific situations, consult a licensed attorney or tax advisor.